|  
 |  
 
Gentleman's Magazine 1851 part 1 p.582 
  
The immediate result was such as might have been  
anticipated. He went to Oxford in his nineteenth year with  
no very accurate knowledge of Greek and Latin, therefore no  
match for Eton-trained scholars in competition for  
distinctions awarded according to Etonian standards, but  
with a mind full of original thoughts and general knowledge, 
and a rare gift of lively and eloquent discourse. "He would  
hold forth by the hour (for no one wished to interrupt him)  
on whatever subject might have been started, either of  
literature, politics, or religion, with an originality of  
thought, a force of illustration, and a facility and beauty  
of expression, which I question (says Mr. Dyce, writing in  
the year 1849) whether any man living except his father,  
could have surpassed." Whether the popularity at  
wine-parties which was the inevitable consequence of such a  
gift, interfered much with his reading during the first year 
or two of his residence, we are not informed. But in the  
summer of 1818, as we learn from Mr. C. H. Townshend (who  
then first met him, and has recorded his impressions in a  
long and interesting letter) he was certainly reading hard.  
At Michaelmas following he took a second class in in  
literis humanioribus; his deficiencies in what is  
exclusively, and somewhat arbitrarily, called "scholarship," 
sinking him below the place which his "talent and general  
knowledge" would have raised him. Soon after, he obtained an 
Oriel fellowship with great distinction; and it seems as if  
he were now honorable providied for, and as if the kindness  
of the friends by whose help he had been sent to college had 
received its best reward. 
  
Had it turned out so, it is probable that the brief outline  
which we have given of his school and college life might  
have been thought to contain all that needed to be  
remembered of it. It might not have been suspected that any  
material feature of his character remained unnoticed. But a  
fellow-elect of Oriel has to pass one year of probation, at  
the end of which, in case of misconduct, his election may be 
cancelled. At the close of this probationary year, Hartley  
Coleridge was judged to have forfeited his fellowship, "on  
the ground mainly of intemperance." Great efforts were made  
in vain at the time to get the decision reversed; and sever  
comments have been made upon it since. We have ourselves  
heard it confidently asserted by a very high and grave  
authority, - a man by no means given to think indulgently of 
intemperance, or suspiciously fo dignities, and one whom the 
question must have deeply interested at the time, - that the 
charge of intemperance was in fact a pretext only, and that  
the real offence was of quite another kind, less venial  
perhaps in the eyes of college authorities, though not so  
easily reached by their statutes, and, in the eyes of the  
world, no offence at all, - namely, an indiscreet freedom of 
speech with regard to University reforms. Upon this point we 
can only say that the narrative before us gives us no means  
of forming an opinion. We have no account either of the  
specific charges, or of the evidence, or of the answers.  
Judging, however, from the tenor of Hartley's subsequent  
life, we can hardly assume that he had been guilty of no  
irregularities which formed a fair pretext for rejecting  
him, and (remembering how just his views were, and how  
pungent his remarks, upon established institutions in  
general,) we can have little doubt that he had said  
many things extremely offensive to the ears of authority,  
though perhaps not on that account the less wholesome, had  
they been weighed and considered. 
  
But what, it will be asked, were these  
irregularities? And how did they come upon him? For hitherto 
we have heard of no evil tendencies of any kind. To this  
question neither his brother's recollections nor the  
evidence which he has collected from others, enable us to  
give a satisfactory answer. We cannot attach much weight to  
early manifestations of "intense sensibility" not under  
proper control; of "impatience of constraint;" of a  
disposition to "shrink from mental pain;" of occasional  
"paroxysms of rage, during which he bit his arm or finger  
violently;" of a proneness "to yield unconsciously to slight 
temptations, as if swayed by a mechanical impulse apart from 
his volition;" for not only are such infirmities incident  
more or less to the youth of all large and sensitive  
natures, but it does no 
  
 |