|
Ships and Boats on the 1576
Saxton Map of Cumberland and Westmoreland
Ian Friel MA, PhD, FSA
Writer & Historian
2009
Ships and boats were a feature of many 16th century
charts, coastal maps and atlases. There is little doubt that
most of the vessels depicted were generic illustrations,
rather than portraits of specific ships. There are a few
exceptions to this, such as the 1580 map of the siege of
Smerwick Bay in Ireland, which appears to show the actual
images of the English warships involved (NMM 1988, p.74)
Christopher Saxton's map of Cumberland and Westmoreland
(1576) shows six vessels, one three-master (number 1) one
two-master (number 2) , two single-masted vessels (3 and 4)
and two fishing boats (5 and 6). One of the striking
features of these ships is that all are engaged in trade or
fishing. None are shown in combat, or firing cannon in an
aimless display of aggression, and none of them have their
hulls pierced for gunports (a sign of a ship built for
fighting). Piracy was endemic in English waters in the 16th
century, and it was not at all unusual for even very small
ships to carry weapons of some kind.
Both the three-master and the two-master on the map have
ports in their superstructures, which could suggest the
presence of cannon, but this could imply no more than a
legitimate capability of self-defence. The overall image is
one of ships engaged in purposeful activity, and is found in
some of Saxton's other county maps, such as those of
Hampshire and Sussex. The Hampshire map for example, shows
the Solent and Southampton Water filled with trading vessels
rather than naval shipping. At the time, these waters were
probably among the most heavily-defended areas in Europe, a
naval base.
The ships on Saxton's maps portray a range of types, both
in terms of rig and hull form. The Hampshire map includes a
lot of sprit-rigged one-masters, their distinctive sails
spread out on one side of the mast like bedsheets drying in
the wind, but there is also a big multi-masted trading
carrack of a type that was probably already obsolescent when
Saxon drew the map.
The Cumberland and Westmoreland map vessels show an even
greater variety. Number (1)

is a three-master, although its foremast has been shown
inaccurately behind the billowing mainsail, probably for
artistic reasons - three-masted 'ship-rigged' ships had
square sails on the fore and mainmasts, and a triangular
lateen sail on the mizzenmast at the stern. It has square
main- and maintopsails, and a lateen sail at the mizzen. The
ship has a bowsprit protruding from the bow (used to help in
support the foremast and to facilitate sailhandling) and an
'outligger' projecting from the stern, which was used to
help give extra purchase for the rigging which controlled
the lateen sail.
The three-masted rig was probably the commonest kind used
by seagoing vessels in the 16th century, but documents and
other pictures of the time show that other two- and
one-masted rigs were also used. Number (2)

is a two-masted vessel, apparently sailing close-hauled
(i.e. into the wind), with its 'square' fore and mainsails
spread taut. The mainmast has a top (a circular, railed
platform used for lookouts and defence) and a topmast and
square topsail, with a small pennant or wind-vane at the
masthead.
The two single-masted, square-sailed ships are also of a
kind found in other sources of the period (numbers 3 and
4).


They represent a type that was commonplace in Northern
Europe until the 15th century, when multi-masted vessels
began to supplant them. The craft shown here seem to have
little or no superstructure, and the real vessels which
inspired them may have been little more than large open
boats. That said, one-masters were certainly used in both
coastal and international trade.
Each of the two one-masted fishing boats is shown with
its single mast down, lying from stem to stern (numbers 5
and 6).


Masts were unshipped in this fashion to create more space
for handling nets, but in larger vessels the mainmast would
have been lowered towards the stern, to rest in a
specially-constructed support. The fact that this is not the
case with these two boats suggests that they were intended
to represent very small craft. Their hull-shapes have a
significant rise from amidships towards the stem and stern
(known as 'sheer'). A pronounced sheer can make a hull
stronger, but it was also commonplace for 16th-century
English artists to depict small boats in this way, and the
form of these craft may have owed more to artistic tradition
than observation.
The hull details of the vessels shown by Saxton are not
very realistic, but these are very small ship-pictures
created in a period when ship imagery could vary from the
realistic to the fanciful. One gets the impression that
Christopher Saxton had a real understanding of the
variations between different ship-types. Whilst his coastal
maps are not a technical gazetteer of the merchant shipping
and fishing boats found in English waters on the 1570s, they
give us a more realistic picture of these kinds of vessels
than might at first be imagined. Beyond that, they convey an
image of a maritime nation engaged in 'honourable trade',
belying the traditional representation of Elizabethan 'sea
dogs' as no more than pirates or fighters.
|